“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a long way they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous seen.
Unfortunately, that was not legitimate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son explained to his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to possessing sexually molested the few’s son several times.
The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal has not challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're on the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally audio, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion can be considered, however, we are distinct inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, issue to availability of vacancy issue to your approval with the competent authority.
Previous 4 tax years interpreted. It is not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
States also normally have courts that deal with only a specific subset of legal matters, like family regulation and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common law, is the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court as well as precedent, case legislation might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision via the U.S. Court of Appeals with the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) is not strictly bound to follow the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by 1 district court in Ny is not really binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning could possibly help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions with the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been with the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're issue to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case of the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we're very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, matter to availability of vacancy topic towards the approval from the competent authority. Read more
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar problem. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in implementing the legislation. This example of case regulation refers to two cases read inside the state court, within the same level.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its original purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more
Within the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court will be the highest court in the United States. Decreased courts about the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related for the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that entail parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every state has its own judicial system that consists of trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each individual state is often referred to as the “supreme” court, Whilst there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or even the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Though state courts may additionally generally hear cases involving federal laws.
How much sway case legislation holds may well differ by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances in the current case. To take a look at this concept, consider the following case regulation definition.
This article delves into the intricacies from the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to deliver an extensive understanding of its implications and simple applications.
13309-B of 2010 to become weak types of evidence and also the evidentiary value whereof would be observed on the time with the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, website So, confirmed custody from the petitioner in jail is not going to provide any helpful purpose at this stage.”
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set via the government.